Archive for the ‘Commercial Arbitration and Mediation’ Category

Herb Silber
Monday, July 11th, 2011    Posted by Herb Silber (posts)

Herb Silber is a graduate of the Harvard School of Negotiation Mediation Program

An effective Mediator knows that often the parties’ bargaining positions are not reflective of what truly stands behind their positions. While on the surface it may seem that the issue is simply dollars and cents, the fact is that their positions are often driven by other motives. These motives can be such things as anger, lack of recognition, desire to punish, or hopes for concessions.  The Mediator needs to be able to assess which of these motives are behind the positions taken by the parties so that he cannot try to diffuse these factors. It often will prove very difficult to settle a dispute without the parties being able to modify the form or content of their original demands. An effective Mediator knows this and will use his or her skill to assist the parties in distinguishing their true underlying needs-things that the parties will need to address to have any chance in settling the dispute-from their original desires or motives, and modify their bargaining positions accordingly.  This is the task of helping the parties move from the positions they are taking to identifying the interests that underlie those positions and effectively dealing with them to achieve a settlement.

Tags:

Herb Silber
Thursday, March 10th, 2011    Posted by Herb Silber (posts)

Herb Silber is a graduate of the Harvard School of Negotiation Mediation Program

As mentioned in my earlier post The Mediator as a Facilitator, one of the challenges in mediation is how to deal with the breakdown in communication and trust between the parties. As is often the case,  they may not have spoken since the dispute arose.

The breakdown of communication is likely good evidence that the parties are not understanding each other’s positions.  Mediation is an exercise in dealing with interests, of course, not positions.  Regardless, the Mediator must quickly assess if the parties are not just talking at each other, but also truly understanding what the other is saying.  Reasons for a lack of understanding include a lack of awareness of certain facts or differing perceptions of the meaning of those facts.

The mediator, therefore. can provide a valuable service to the parties by “drilling down” on the facts and understandings each party may have and not only transmitting information that may not be known, or whose relevance has not been given sufficient importance, but also translating that information in a way that may give each party a new perspective on the dispute. Both functions are important and may pay big dividends in achieving a successful outcome.

 


Tags:

Herb Silber
Monday, January 10th, 2011    Posted by Herb Silber (posts)

Herb Silber is a graduate of the Harvard School of Negotiation Mediation Program

As an effective mediator, one needs to be able to facilitate the dialogue between the parties. This may be the only time the parties have faced each other since the dispute arose.

Thus, the effective mediator must try to keep the discussion going in circumstances where there is often mistrust and hostility. A calm and rationale voice is needed as well as an opportunity for the parties to get their “beef off their chest.”

Once that has occurred, the mediator must try to channel the parties to see the wisdom of a settlement and the folly of continuing their dispute.  He or she must find a way to convert the conflict between the parties so that it becomes an impetus to achieving a settlement, not an impediment.

One way to move the parties down this road, as an example, is by phrasing or re-phrasing possible areas of agreement. It is well accepted that disputes are not resolved by dwelling on the negative; resolution will be found by discussing areas of agreement between the disputants and having them see the positives in a settlement.

Tags: ,

Herb Silber
Friday, November 5th, 2010    Posted by Herb Silber (posts)

Herb Silber is a graduate of the Harvard School of Negotiation Mediation Program

Mediation is a form of alternative dispute resolution which aims to assist disputing parties in reaching an agreement through the use of a trained third party facilitator.  The process differs from arbitration in that resolution at mediation must be brought about by achieving a voluntary consensus between the parties. On the other hand, in an arbitration, although the decision to engage in the process may or may not be voluntary, the result is a legally binding decision.

Mediators therefore play a unique function in that they must be skilled in bringing about a consensus between the disputing parties.   There are a number of roles that an effective mediator will have to assume during the course of a mediation.  These include:
* Facilitation.
* Translation of the parties’ positions.
* Transmissions of facts that the parties may be unaware of.
* Making sure that the parties focus on their interests rather than getting bogged down on their positions.
* Working with the parties to discover or create options.
* Where required, bringing a “dose of reality” to the parties.

In coming postings on this blog, I will examine and provide more information on each of the elements of the mediator’s role as I have set out above.   I hope that my analysis will be of assistance to parties contemplating alternatives to resolving their disputes through traditional adjucative processes.

Tags: , , , ,

Herb Silber
Thursday, February 4th, 2010    Posted by Herb Silber (posts)

The focus of the civil justice system over the past number of years has, in large measure, been driven by a desire to both reduce the skyrocketing costs associated with litigation as well as the time frame for rendering a decision. As may be readily seen, these two goals are inter-related.

Despite the best efforts by the judiciary and the legal profession to accomplish the foregoing goals, the results have been far from satisfactory. As a result, more and more clients are asking their counsel “Is there a better way?”

The logical and rational answer is yes, through the means of alternative dispute resolution. The two aspects of alternative dispute resolution are mediation and arbitration. There are a number of differences between mediation and arbitration – some of them obvious and others more subtle. The main difference, however, is that mediation is a consensual process – in essence a form of controlled negotiation, while arbitration, while consensual at the outset, the ultimate result is an imposed resolution.

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: